Bilateral sinonasal inverted papillomas originating from both sides of the frontal sinus and the left lamina papyracea: A case report.

RATIONALE: The present investigation documented a case of bilateral sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP) that arose from both sides of the frontal sinus and ethmoid sinus. The occurrence of bilateral involvement of the nasal cavities and frontal sinus is rather infrequent. PATIENT CONCERNS: Informed consent was obtained from the patient. DIAGNOSIS: Bilateral SNIP. INTERVENTIONS: The tumor was completely removed by Draf III endoscopic resection complemented by an external eyebrow arch approach, and the postoperative recovery was uneventful. OUTCOMES: The purpose of this paper is to present a comprehensive reference for the management of bilateral SNIP that affects the frontal sinuses. LESSONS: This study addresses the staging and surgical management of bilateral SNIP, along with a review of the factors contributing to its recurrence. The recommended treatment method involves applying the Draf III technique combined with an external nasal approach.

Psammomatoid ossifying fibroma in the frontal sinus: An intriguing clinical encounter-A detailed case report.

BACKGROUND: Psammomatoid ossifying fibroma (POF) is a rare craniofacial neoplasm, primarily affecting the maxillofacial region, and typically observed in adolescents and young adults. This case report presents a unique occurrence of POF in a 50-year-old male, defying the conventional age range and exhibiting an unusual anatomical location within the frontal sinus. CASE: A 50-year-old male with a prior history of cecal adenocarcinoma and colectomy presented with left eye proptosis and new-onset headaches. Imaging revealed a well-defined calcified mass in the left frontal sinus, leading to a diagnosis of POF. Open surgical resection was performed to remove the tumor, and histopathological evaluation confirmed its diagnosis as psammomatoid ossifying fibroma. The patient exhibited no postoperative complications or signs of recurrence. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the diverse clinical presentations and diagnostic challenges associated with POF, emphasizing the importance of accurate diagnosis and multidisciplinary collaboration. Further research is needed to explore the genetic underpinnings and optimal management strategies for this intriguing condition.

[Local flap reconstruction techniques after frontal sinus drainage type II and III according to Draf]. / Lokale Lappenplastiken bei der Stirnhöhlendrainage Typ II und III nach Draf.

BACKGROUND: Extended endonasal endoscopic frontal sinus surgery is characterized by bone resection beyond the lamellae of the frontal sinus and is currently classified according to Draf as type IIa, type IIb, modified type III (also referred to as type IIc), and type III. This approach is indicated when the surgical goal cannot be achieved through complete removal of the anterior ethmoidal cells. Numerous studies indicate restenosis rates ranging from 7 to 36%, despite creation of maximal openings. Exposed bone, which tends to epithelize slowly with significant crusting and the risk of uncontrolled wound healing depending on the local environment and other factors, is considered a contributing factor. Covering the exposed bone with mucosa can significantly reduce the risk of restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A variety of flap techniques for frontal sinus drainage in Draf III procedures are presented, including some variants that were part of presentations at the 2023 Congress of the European Rhinologic Society in Sofia, Bulgaria. These include combinations of free mucosal grafts, pedicled mucosal flaps, and hybrids combining both techniques. Additionally, the results of current studies are presented. CONCLUSION: The results and achieved opening areas in contemporary Draf III surgeries are significantly improved and larger compared to the early stages of these procedures. A multitude of published studies consistently demonstrate that outcomes are markedly improved with mucosal coverage. Depending on the prevailing anatomy, mucosal conditions, and the extent of the surgical intervention, the most suitable technique should be selected. Therefore, proficiency in various methods is crucial. The use of a flap technique (free, pedicled, or combinations thereof) should be defined as the standard when performing extended frontal sinus surgery (Draf IIb, IIc, III, or endonasal frontal sinus surgery [EFSS] 4-6).

Management of frontal sinus fractures requiring surgical intervention: An analysis of a case series.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Isolated frontal bone fractures constitute 5-15% of traumatic facial fractures cases, with frontal sinus fractures categorized into anterior wall, posterior wall, or complex fractures. The approach is tailored to fracture type and bone fragment displacement. This paper presents the summary of surgical management in patients with isolated and complex fractures of the anterior wall of the frontal sinus.</br> <b><br>Material and Methods:</b> Five patients with different frontal sinus fractures were treated surgically. The same management protocol - diagnosis and surgical intervention was implemented in all cases The retrospective analysis included fracture assessment, surgical approach, and long-term outcomes evaluation.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> The most common cause of fractures was falls, while two complex fractures involved the anterior and posterior walls. External approach, bone fragment removal, endoscopy, and external stabilization were employed in all cases. One patent required delayed revision surgery due to retaining metallic foreign body. Follow-up radiological examinations showed proper healing and cosmetic outcomes were satisfactory in all of the cases.</br> <b><br>Conclusion:</b> Surgical management of isolated fractures of the frontal sinus anterior wall, involving bone fragment removal, realignment, and endoscopy, yielded satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes without internal or external stabilization. Long-term monitoring and symptom assessment are crucial, especially in cases with penetrating injuries and foreign body risk.</br>.

Carolyn's window approach for spontaneous frontal sinus meningoencephalocele.

Spontaneous meningoencephaloceles (MECs) are sparsely documented in the literature. Those occurring in the frontal sinus are an exceedingly rare entity. MECs are commonly associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhoea. CSF rhinorrhoea is frequently misdiagnosed, causing delays in diagnosis and management. The subsequently increased risk of bacterial meningitis can be life-threatening to patients. We report the case of a woman in her late 70s with a spontaneous frontal sinus MEC, presenting with a 6-month history of CSF rhinorrhoea. The patient was successfully treated using the novel Carolyn's window approach endoscopically; 9-month follow-up revealed no skull-base breach. Our case emphasises the importance of considering MEC as a differential diagnosis for clear rhinorrhoea and demonstrates successful repair through a novel surgical approach.

Anatomic Relationship Between the Head of the Middle Turbinate and First Olfactory Filum: A Radiographic Assessment.

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (EMLP) has become a frequently utilized procedure in rhinologic surgery. One of the most serious complications of the procedure is cerebrospinal fluid leak, which may occur due to lack of recognition of the anterior skull base in the region of the first olfactory filum (FOF), or direct injury to the FOF itself. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the position of the head of the middle turbinate (MT) relative to the FOF, which is an important landmark in the EMLP. METHODS: A series of previously obtained patient computed tomography scans of the sinus were reviewed. A reproducible process was implemented to obtain the measurements. First, the FOF was identified on an axial series. Using a localization feature of the radiographic software, this anteroposterior (AP) position could be visualized in a coronal plane. Subsequently, the MT was viewed in a sagittal plane, where a measurement between the head of the MT and the AP position of the FOF could be performed. RESULTS: The AP distance between the head of the MT and the FOF was measured in 92 patients. The head of the MT was either at or anterior to the FOF in all measured subjects. The mean anterior distance of the head of the MT to FOF was 3.6 mm (±2.4 mm) on the right, and 3.8 mm (±2.2 mm) on the left. The range in AP distance was 0 to 12 mm. There was no significant difference in AP distance between the head of the MT and FOF based on gender (P = .413) or diagnosis (P = .254). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, the head of the MT was reliably at or anterior to the FOF in all subjects, suggesting its utility as a fixed landmark in endoscopic sinus surgery, particularly in the EMLP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

CT analysis of frontal recess air cell and fluid dynamics simulation of frontal sinus in people with different frontal sinus development after Draf1-3 surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effects of Draf1-3 on frontal sinus airflow and frontal sinus irrigation in people with different frontal sinus development METHODS: The development of the frontal sinus and the distribution of the frontal recess cells were evaluated by CT scan in 150 adults (300 sides). The airflow changes into the frontal sinus and frontal recess after Draf were analyzed by Fluent software under a steady state and quiet inspiratory state. Nasal irrigation after Draf in adults with well-developed frontal sinus was simulated using 120 mL saline at a rate of 12 mL/s in a position at 45° to observe the changes in transient flow distribution. RESULTS: The moderately developed type of the frontal sinus was the most common. The airflow patterns in the frontal sinus and frontal recess in the moderate development group were laminar, while several large vortexes were formed between the frontal sinus and frontal recess in the well-development group. The Draf exerted more significant effects on the patterns, pressure, and velocity of the airflow in the frontal sinus and frontal recess in the well development group than in the moderate development group. The volume fraction of saline in the frontal sinus increased significantly from Draf1 to Draf3, and the time required for a complete infiltration of saline in the frontal sinus mucosa was significantly reduced. CONCLUSIONS: Draf1-3 has different effects on the airflow field of the frontal sinus with different developmental types; and Draf1-3 can significantly improve the postoperative flushing of the frontal sinus.

The Usefulness of Surgical Titanium Microclips for Mucosal Repair in the Frontal Sinus Using ORBEYE: A Technical Note.

Bifrontal craniotomy frequently involves opening the frontal sinus and mucosal injury. We report a new technique for mucosal repair in the frontal sinus using surgical titanium microclips. Six consecutive patients who underwent bifrontal craniotomy with frontal sinus exposure and mucosal injury underwent mucosal repair using surgical titanium microclips between April 2019 and August 2022. In all cases, the frontal sinus mucosa was peeled from the inner walls of the frontal sinus to ensure sufficient mucosal margin for clipping using ORBEYE. The repair was accomplished with the microclips in all cases. We also sealed the mucosal wound using fibrin glue and sufficiently filled the frontal sinus with bone debris, resulting in zero incidence of postoperative liquorrhea in all cases. Repairing the mucosa using surgical titanium microclips using ORBEYE may be a simple and quick technique when the frontal sinus mucosa is injured during craniotomy.

Frontal sinus stenting in endoscopic sinus surgery: the 10-year Oxford experience.

BACKGROUND: Frontal sinus stents have been introduced to reduce frontal sinus re-stenosis after surgery and to improve outcomes. METHOD: This study was a retrospective analysis of 19 patients who had endoscopic sinus surgery with approach to the frontal sinus and insertion of a soft sinus stent. RESULTS: The frontal recess was patent in 78.9 per cent and stenosed in 21.1 per cent of patients; no completely closed recesses were observed. Mean follow up was 20.7 months, and time period of stenting was 9.8 months on average; complications were observed in 47.4 per cent of the patients, with post-operative sinonasal infection being the most common. CONCLUSION: In the authors' experience, indications for frontal sinus stenting include recalcitrant chronic rhinosinusitis after multiple functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (especially in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps), patients with history of important craniofacial surgery or trauma, and recurrent mucoceles. The stent was overall well tolerated as only minor complications were observed. Close clinical follow up is mandatory.

The Upper Attachment of the Uncinate Process and Anterior Ethmoidal Artery.

OBJECTIVE: Variations in the upper attachment of the uncinate process (UP) are important because they can affect frontal sinus drainage and change the morphology. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is the primary technique used to treat chronic medically refractory rhinosinusitis. Uncinectomy is the basis of FESS technique to obtain the best possible result from surgery. The anterior ethmoidal artery (AEA) enters the nasal cavity through the orbital medial wall (lamina papyracea) may also be affected by the upper attachment of the UP. The aim of this study was to investigate a possible link between UP variations and the course of the AEA. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective, computed tomography (CT)-based, anatomic study was conducted on 200 healthy adults (100 females and 100 males) by screening bilateral paranasal sinus images. The upper attachment of the UP was classified in 6 types (1-6) based on the Liu classification. The AEA was divided into 4 types (A-D) based on location: anterior to the frontal sinus (A), between the frontal sinus and the middle nasal turbinate (B), and anterior to the posterior ethmoidal cells (C and D). All the CT images were evaluated simultaneously by 2 anatomists and 1 radiologist. RESULTS: Of the total cases (200 right and 200 left side), 48.8% were type 1 UP attachment, 11.0% type 2, 12% type 3, 9% type 4, 18% type 5, and 1.2% type 6. The AEAs were classified as 12.2% type A, 71.8% type B, 15.2% type C, and 0.8% type D. CONCLUSION: The course of the AEA through the nasal cavity was observed to shift anteriorly from the ethmoidal bulla to the frontal sinus in patients with UP attached to the lamina papyracea and middle turbinate. Remarkably, the AEA always coursed anterior from the middle nasal turbinate line.

Anatomy of the Frontal Sinus Drainage Pathway Evaluated in 247 Cadavers to Prevent Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage After Frontobasal Craniotomy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The frontal sinus (FS) drainage pathway (FSDP) may be a conduit for cerebrospinal fluid leakage after frontobasal craniotomy. In this cadaveric study, we aimed to evaluate the anatomy of the FSDP. METHODS: The FSs and FSDPs of 247 cadavers were investigated. We counted the number of FSs and FSDPs in each half-head, verified the presence of a narrowing section in each FSDP, and evaluated the depth, shape, and size of each narrowing FSDP section. RESULTS: We investigated 494 sides and 472 FSDPs of 247 cadavers. FSs were unilaterally undeveloped in 13 of 247 cadavers (5.3%) and bilaterally in 8 (3.2%). FSs were unilaterally duplicated in 7 of 247 cadavers (2.8%), and no FSs were bilaterally duplicated or triplicated. No FSs had 2 or more FSDPs, and all 472 investigated FSDPs were invariably narrowed at various depths. The narrowing FSDP sections were elliptical (78.6%), circular (18.1%), triangular (1.8%), or crescent-shaped (1.4%) and of varying thickness and orientation. Although FSDPs were asymmetric in 92.2% of cadavers and narrowing FSDP sections were located deep (8.9 ± 4.4 mm from the anterior skull base), the narrowing FSDP sections were typically small (area: 5.9 ± 3.3 mm 2 ) or thin (short diameter: 2.1 ± 0.7 mm). CONCLUSION: Each FS had only one FSDP, all FSDPs were invariably narrowed at various depths, and the narrowing FSDP sections were sufficiently small or thin to allow local closure, facilitating prevention of cerebrospinal fluid leakage after frontobasal craniotomy.

Frontal Osteomyelitis and Sinusitis Complication After Type III Frontal Bone Cranioplasty for Facial Feminization.

Background: Forehead contouring can be a component of facial feminization surgery (FFS). Its complications have been rarely reported on and are often described as "hypothetical." Methods: A case report of complications from forehead contouring resulting in frontal osteomyelitis and sinusitis. Results: A female patient presented with frontal osteomyelitis, sinusitis, and forehead contour deformity after a type III forehead contouring surgery. She had failed prior treatment including oral antibiotics, IV antibiotics, revision sinus surgery, and revision nasal surgery. For definitive treatment, she underwent an anterior table resection, sinus obliteration with bony contouring, and pericranial flap. Conclusions: Forehead contouring represents a recent significant advancement in FFS and gender-affirming therapy. Descriptions of complications and their management are important when novel therapies such as FFS are introduced. This case demonstrates complications from type III forehead contouring including osteomyelitis, frontal sinusitis, and forehead deformity.

[History of frontal sinus surgery and current view of the problem. Part 2]. / Istoriya khirurgii lobnoi pazukhi i sovremennyi vzglyad na problemu. Chast' 2.

Surgical treatment of inflammatory diseases of the frontal sinus is one of the biggest challenges of modern otorhinolaryngology. Close proximity of the frontal sinus and frontal sinus drainage pathways to the skull base, the orbit and the anterior ethmoid artery, great limitations with its visualization and instrumentation, and high risk of the frontal recess scarring cause difficulties in either endoscopic or external approaches to the frontal sinus. At the same time endoscopic approach to the frontal sinus is considered as preferred method of frontal sinusitis surgical treatment by majority of peers nowadays. The introduction of extended approaches to the frontal sinus pathology treatment with frontal sinus floor and interfrontal sinus septum drill-out as well as superior septectomy with common drainage pathway formation gave an opportunity to greatly decrease a rate of indications for external frontal sinus procedures. In this paper historical backgrounds of endonasal approaches to frontal sinuses are presented, current controversies in proper selection of extent and methods of the frontal sinus surgery are analyzed and endoscopic as well as external approaches to frontal sinuses are summarized.

Frontal trans-sinusal approach: how I do it.

BACKGROUND: Anterior skull base lesions could be reached by different approaches (subfrontal, pterional, interhemispheric, etc.). In selected cases, the frontal trans-sinusal approach is an effective alternative to conventional techniques. METHODS: We present our technique to perform a frontal trans-sinusal approach in a patient affected by a large olfactory groove meningioma. DISCUSSION-CONCLUSION: The frontal trans-sinusal approach allows to approach safely lesions of the median anterior cranial fossa. This approach provides lower brain retraction, easier access to olfactory grooves, and earlier tumor devascularization. However, it remains limited to patients with large-sized frontal sinuses and entails some postoperative risks such as mucocele or CSF leak.

Treatment Outcomes With Conservative Management of Frontal Sinus Outflow Tract Fractures.

OBJECTIVE: Historically, early surgical management of frontal sinus outflow tract (FSOT) fractures has been standard practice. There has been a paradigm shift toward nonsurgical or delayed management. Unfortunately, clinical indications and treatment outcomes for this approach are poorly understood. This study evaluates radiologic indicators, as well as sinus reaeration and complication rates for FSOT injuries treated nonsurgically. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of FSOT injuries between 2005 and 2019. SETTING: Academic, tertiary care medical center. METHODS: Radiographic fracture patterns of the frontal ostia (FO) and frontal recess (FR) were recorded as either patent, disrupted, or obstructed. Sinus reaeration, surgical rescue, and complication rates were documented. Patients with follow-up imaging >42 days were included. Patients undergoing immediate surgical intervention were excluded. RESULTS: One hundred patients were identified and 44 met the criteria (88 sinuses). Among nonobstructed FSOT injuries (ie, patent or disrupted), reaeration occurred in 91% of the FO and 98% of FR injuries. Two sinuses required surgical rescue including 1 Draf IIB (1%), and 1 obliteration (1%). Two sinuses had complications including 1 mucocele (1%) and 1 cerebrospinal fluid leak (1%). FO and FR fracture patterns had no identifiable correlation with long-term reaeration rates or the need for surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Among nonobstructive injuries to the FSOT, average reaeration rates in observed patients were high (91%-98%). Rescue surgery (2%) and complication rates (2%) were low, suggesting that nonsurgical management of nonobstructed FSOT is a viable strategy. No radiographic features were clearly identified to be predictive of sinus reaeration.

Acellular Dermal Matrix, Osseoplastic Flap, and Transnasal Endoscopic Approach for Frontal Mucocele.

PURPOUSE: The primary objective of this study is to suggest the use of acellular dermal matrix through an osteoplastic flap and transnasal endoscopic treatment for the management of frontal mucoceles. The secondary objective is to propose the characteristics to choose this approach. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was carried out on patients with frontal mucoceles of different etiologies where an osteoplastic flap was made to address the sinus and subsequently obliterated with acellular dermal matrix. RESULTS: A cohort of 11 patients were included in the study, 6 (67%) were female and 5 (56%) were male, with a mean age of 56 years (range 35-71). The majority of patients (73%) with a history of trauma and all the patients were treated with frontal osteoplastic flap and obliteration with acellular dermal matrix. No evidence of recurrence in a follow-up period with a mean of 18 months and a low rate of complications. CONCLUSIONS: The frontal osteoplastic flap and obliteration with acellular dermal matrix is a simple and safe technique to perform with low morbidity. Also, an orbital reconstruction can be performed simultaneously.

Computed tomographic characteristics of frontal sinus ossifying fibroma in a dog.

A 10-year-old female spayed Kelpie cross was presented to The Austin Vet Specialists for further investigation of a mineralized, lobulated frontal sinus mass that had previously been detected radiographically. Computed tomography (CT) revealed a large, expansile, well-defined, heterogeneously mineral attenuating mass invading both frontal sinuses. The mass was surgically debulked via a frontal sinusotomy approach. Histopathology was consistent with ossifying fibroma. This  is the first published report to describe frontal sinus ossifying fibroma in a dog, and the second to describe CT features of ossifying fibroma involving the cranium in a dog.

Autologous Fat Versus Hydroxyapatite Cement for Use in Frontal Sinus Obliteration: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Frontal sinus obliteration is a possible terminus for the management of chronic sinusitis, frontal bone trauma, cancer extirpation, or mucocele. The mucosa of the sinus is stripped and space obliterated with either autogenic, allopathic, or synthetic materials. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of autologous fat and hydroxyapatite cement (HAC) for frontal sinus obliteration. METHODS: A multidatabase systematic review was conducted to collect outcomes on frontal sinus obliterations with either autologous fat or HAC. Outcomes collected included infection of the frontal sinus or obliteration material, mucocele formation, skin infection at the operative site, hematoma or seroma, cosmetic defect, donor site infection, and need for revision procedure. Prevalence of outcomes was analyzed through meta-analysis of proportions. RESULTS: Twenty studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. Sixteen studies reported outcomes for 667 patients obliterated with autologous fat, and 7 studies reported outcomes for 100 patients obliterated with HAC. Prevalence of infection of the frontal sinus or obliteration material, mucocele formation, skin infection at the operative site, hematoma or seroma, and cosmetic defect did not differ statistically between the cohorts. Donor site infection secondary to fat harvesting for fat obliteration had a prevalence of <0.01. Revision rate was 0.04 (95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.8) for fat obliteration and 0.10 (95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.33) for HAC obliteration. CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences in the studied outcomes were detected between obliterations with autologous fat and HAC, suggesting that either is equally suitable and may be up to the surgeon's preference.

Recreating the microscopic direct access Draf 2a frontal sinusotomy in the endoscopic era and comparison to an angled instrument approach.

PURPOSE: Microscopic Draf 2a frontal sinusotomy relied on direct access. However, the modern-day endoscopic approach is hindered by the anterior-posterior dimensions of the frontal recess. The nasofrontal beak, angled endoscopes, and variable frontal recess anatomy make the surgery challenging. Carolyn's window frontal sinusotomy removes the limitation of anterior-posterior dimensions and is an endoscopic version of the microscopic Draf 2a. This study aims to compare the perioperative outcomes and morbidity from endoscopic direct access Draf 2a compared to angled access Draf 2a. METHODS: Consecutive adult patients (> 18 years) seen at a tertiary referral clinic who underwent Draf 2a frontal sinus surgery using either endoscopic direct access (Carolyn's window) or endoscopic angled instrumentation were included. Patients who underwent Carolyn's window were compared to those with angled Draf 2a frontal sinusotomy. RESULTS: One hundred patients (age 51.96 ± 15.85 years, 48.0% female, follow-up 60.75 ± 17.34 months) were included. 44% of patients used Carolyn's window approach. 100% [95% CI 98.2-100%] of patients achieved successful frontal sinus patency. Both groups were comparable for early morbidities (bleeding, pain, crusting, and adhesions) and late morbidities (retained frontal recess partitions). There were no other morbidities in the early and late postoperative periods. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic direct access Draf 2a, or Carolyn's window, removes the anteroposterior diameter limitation. The frontal sinus patency and early and late surgical morbidities of direct access Draf 2a were comparable with the angled Draf 2a frontal sinusotomy. Surgical modifications, often with drills and bone removal, can be successfully made to enhance access in endoscopic sinus surgery without concern for additional morbidity.

Outcomes of Frontal Sinus Stenting With Steroid Impregnated Microsponge Versus Steroid-Eluting Implant.

BACKGROUND: Mometasone-eluting poly-L-lactide-coglycolide (MPLG) is available commercially for frontal sinus ostium (FSO) stenting. An alternative chitosan polymer-based drug delivery microsponge is also available at a lower cost per unit. OBJECTIVE: To compare the outcomes of MPLG stents versus triamcinolone-impregnated chitosan polymer (TICP) microsponge in frontal sinus surgery. METHODS: Patients who underwent endoscopic sinus surgery from December 2018 to February 2022 were reviewed to identify those with the intraoperative placement of TICP microsponge or MPLG stent in the FSO. FSO patency was evaluated by endoscopy at follow-up. Twenty-two-item sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) was also recorded, and complications were noted. RESULTS: A total of 68 subjects and 96 FSOs were treated. TICP was first used in August 2021 and MPLG in December 2018. MPLG placement in a Draf 3 cavity was excluded since TICP had not been used during Draf 3 procedure. Both cohorts (TICP 20 subjects, 35 FSOs; MPLG 26 subjects, 39 FSOs) had similar clinical characteristics. At a mean total follow-up of 249.2 days for TICP and 490.4 days for MPLG, FSO patency was 82.9% and 87.1%, respectively (P = .265). At an equivalent follow-up of 130.6 days in TICP and 154.0 days in MPLG, patency was 94.3% and 89.7%, respectively (P = .475). Both groups showed significant reductions in SNOT-22 (P < .001). MPLG demonstrated crusting within the FSO at 1 month (none in TICP). CONCLUSION: FSO patency for both stents was similar, although TICP had significantly lower costs per unit. Additional comparative trials may be helpful for guiding clinicians on the appropriate clinical situations for the use of these devices.